Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Be.n Murray's avatar

I recall reading about the LM / ITN libel trial at the time, and remember thinking that these so-called journalists were just insecure, attention-seeking contrarians, stamping their little feet and insisting that everyone listens to them. Even if they had to publish absolute pish to get their 15 seconds of notoriety.

But while I'm sure that the adolescent posturing remains a big part of their nonsense, perhaps there's more to it than that. They were clearly early adopters of the maxim that everything is subjective, there's no such thing as reality, and if you can convince enough people to subscribe to your particular brand of bollocks then on some level it does actually become true.

Sadly, this complete refusal to distinguish between objective fact and fantastical wishful thinking has only become ever more popular over the last 3 decades. LM was ahead of its time, but not in a good way.

Expand full comment
Nathan's avatar

This is an odd thing to re-litigate. This was a war with atrocities on all sides, which Westerners should have stayed out of. No-one with any decency cries about these NATO proxy jihadis.

Expand full comment

No posts